DV

Energy-cost-burden risk

Hidd · Muharraq Governorate
Modelled (mock)
Score
46 / 100
Rank 1 of 8 local authorities scored on this signal
Confidence
high (80%)
Sample-size-scaled, not a model calibration
Estimated annual impact
BD 216
modelled annual impact

Rationale and recommended action

78% of the panel poorly insulated, 50% on inefficient window-unit AC, consumption +6% vs the panel average.

→ Prioritise for a targeted energy-efficiency advice campaign — poor insulation and inefficient window-unit AC compound cooling-cost risk here.

What produced this score

national-insights-mock v0.1.0 (mock). Scores are rule-based, not learned, and were never fitted or validated against an outcome. Treat the ranking as an indicative prioritisation for further review, not a validated prediction.

Trained on: Not trained on anything — a deterministic, seeded heuristic over this panel's own synthetic ground truth. Stands in for a real model until one is built and validated against real outcomes.

Features it sees: pct_poor_insulation, pct_inefficient_ac, kwh_index, fault_rate

What drove this score

The feature values computed for Hidd, aggregated across 18 households — the pipeline never sees a household individually, only these authority-level shares and averages.

Poorly/fairly insulated dwellings78%
On inefficient window-unit AC50%
Households with a detected fault28%
Consumption index
1.06
1.00 = panel average
Retrofit target households
5
Target cooling load
46,020 kWh/yr

How this local authority compares

Every local authority scored on this same signal, ranked highest first — Hidd is highlighted.

Hidd46/100

Monthly consumption — Hidd

Electricity summed across every household in this local authority, for context on the consumption behind this score — not a per-household reading.

Electricity
0k22k44k040506070809101112010203
Hover a column for the month's split.